# GeNext MedEd Foundation — Learner & Faculty Feedback Standard

**Document code:** GMEF-QA-004
**Version:** 1.0
**Status:** Controlled working standard

## Purpose
Turns feedback into programme-quality evidence while protecting participants from pressure and separating satisfaction from competency or academic outcomes.

## Feedback domains
Learning objectives; relevance; teaching quality; supervision; skills-station/resource adequacy; organisation; assessment fairness/clarity; learning environment; safety/professionalism; suggestions; faculty perspective on learner readiness and programme design.

## Collection
Feedback may be anonymous where appropriate. Participation should not be coerced or tied to favourable assessment. Identifiable concerns requiring action are handled through the appropriate confidential process.

## Interpretation
High satisfaction does not prove competency or programme effectiveness. Feedback should be considered with attendance, assessment, completion, faculty review, incidents and outcome indicators.

## Escalation
Credible allegations concerning safety, harassment, discrimination, research integrity, privacy, assessment misconduct or other serious governance matters should not remain only in aggregated feedback; they require appropriate confidential review/escalation.

## Reporting
Programme reports should use aggregated results where possible, identify recurrent themes, document actions and avoid publishing small-group information that could expose individuals.