Learner & Faculty Feedback Standard

GeNext MedEd Foundation — Learner & Faculty Feedback Standard

Document code: GMEF-QA-004
Version: 1.0
Status: Controlled working standard

Purpose
Turns feedback into programme-quality evidence while protecting participants from pressure and separating satisfaction from competency or academic outcomes.

Feedback domains
Learning objectives; relevance; teaching quality; supervision; skills-station/resource adequacy; organisation; assessment fairness/clarity; learning environment; safety/professionalism; suggestions; faculty perspective on learner readiness and programme design.

Collection
Feedback may be anonymous where appropriate. Participation should not be coerced or tied to favourable assessment. Identifiable concerns requiring action are handled through the appropriate confidential process.

Interpretation
High satisfaction does not prove competency or programme effectiveness. Feedback should be considered with attendance, assessment, completion, faculty review, incidents and outcome indicators.

Escalation
Credible allegations concerning safety, harassment, discrimination, research integrity, privacy, assessment misconduct or other serious governance matters should not remain only in aggregated feedback; they require appropriate confidential review/escalation.

Reporting
Programme reports should use aggregated results where possible, identify recurrent themes, document actions and avoid publishing small-group information that could expose individuals.